A recent paper in Nature shows how quantitative improvements in scientific instruments can bring broad new vistas to light. Carbon 14 dating was devised to date carbon in organic matter, from bones to charcoal, in archaeology, but carbon 14 forms in any material containing nitrogen that is exposed at the Earth’s surface to the neutrons generated by cosmic rays.
The quantitative problem of applying the C14 technique to materials containing mere traces of nitrogen and carbon, like quartz , has been solved in recent years by advances in accelerator mass spectrometry, which allows dates to be calculated even if only a few parts per million of carbon are present.
The Nature paper reports on the exposure of rocks on
The top of a granite Obelisk like 'Cleopatra's Needle', for example ,might yield a quartz 14 C age of 3500 while the bottom, reflecting its having been toppled in say, 500 AD might yield one of 1500
So, if modern science gives conflicting dates in their sometimes fanciful reconstructions and dating of “history,” perhaps the creationists are right after all?
Posted by: Henry Barth | March 21, 2008 at 08:44 PM
> perhaps the creationists are right after all?
Ya! Furthermore, this clearly increases support for the "flat" theory of Earth...
Posted by: Bob | March 22, 2008 at 03:15 PM
somehow stumbled upon your blog while looking for a article for a class, but I have to say I'm thrilled I found it ...will definately come back sometime.
Posted by: Cheap Escorts | February 13, 2011 at 01:45 AM
somehow found your blog while browsing for a article for a class, but I have to say I'm thrilled I found it ...will definately subscribe sometime.
Posted by: Oralee GolubRubye HeeterPeter LochridgeCathrine Santa | February 23, 2011 at 01:33 AM
If you wish to be the best man, you must suffer the bitterest of the bitter.
Posted by: moncler jackets | November 22, 2011 at 02:30 AM